Sec 397 of crpc
Web14 Jun 2024 · Section 397 (2) of Cr.P.C. reads as under: If an application under this Section has been made by any person either to the High Court or to the Sessions Judge, no further … WebAnswers ( 1 ) The limitation period as per article 131 of the limitation act is of 90 days and it has been clearly held by the salekh chand vs Deepak sharma,kkd that the revision period is not condonable unless express circumstances exist.
Sec 397 of crpc
Did you know?
Web7 Jun 2009 · The feasible test is whether by upholding the objections raised by a party, it would result in culminating the proceedings, if so any order passed on such objections would not be merely interlocutory in nature as envisaged in section 397 (2) of the Code. Web2 Jan 2024 · Appeal can be done by any superior court. Any court review any judgment. 5. Reference can be done in any stage of case such as pending, execution or at appeal. When there is no appeal, Revision can be done. Appeal can be made after passing any appealable order or decree. Review can be made even if appeal lies. 6.
Web11 Feb 2024 · On the issue of whether an order under Section 23 of the Act would be an interlocutory order or not, thereby creating a bar on filing revision under Section 397(2) of CrPC, the Court relied on the decision of Allahabad High Court in Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. State of UP to hold that the same is a final order. Web8 Jun 2024 · Section 397 (2) of CrPC bars the power of the Courts to exercise revision in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any appeal, inquiry, trial or other proceeding. The term interlocutory order has not been defined in the CrPC.
Web12 Apr 2024 · Similarly, at present, under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”), the High Court and Court of Session inter- alia have the power to call for and examine the records of ... Web14 Apr 2024 · Chapter -29Appeals :_Sec 372 to 394 of CrPC_Chapter -30Revision :_Sec 397 and 401 of CrPC__Section 357 of CrPC__Section 2(wa) of CrPC_Limitation Act :_Articl...
Web4 Jul 2024 · Order framing charge may not be held to be purely an interlocutory order and can in a given situation be interfered with under Section 397(2) CrPC or 482 CrPC or Article 227 of the Constitution which is a constitutional provision but the power of the High Court to interfere with an order framing charge and to grant stay is to be exercised only ...
Web17 Sep 2011 · The feasible test is whether by upholding the objections raised by a party, it would result in culminating the proceedings, if so any order passed on such objections would not be merely interlocutory in nature as envisaged in section 397 (2) of the Code. lickitung weakness pokemonWeb10 Apr 2024 · Under section 397 CrPC, the High Court and Court of Session have been empowered to call for and examine the records of any proceeding and satisfy oneself as … mckinsey case interview caseWebSection 397 CrPC, inter alia, on the ground that taking cognizance in this matter was barred by limitation. The Additional Sessions Judge, Khachrod dismissed the revision petition so filed by the accused-respondents on 27.07.2015 while holding, inter alia, that the bar of limitation was 2 ‘IPC’ for short. lickitung shirt pokemon goWeb15 Feb 2024 · Section 397 to Section 405 include the powers of revision granted to the higher courts, and the procedure to exercise these powers. It must be noted that these … lickitung x and yWeb11 Feb 2024 · Section 397 (2) clearly states that “The powers of revision conferred by sub-section (1) shall not be exercised in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any appeal, inquiry, trial or other proceeding.” Therefore, accused cannot file revision petition against interlocutory order. In Father Thomas Vs. lick it up 6 streamingWeb18 Mar 2009 · As CRPC 1.7 (d) (1) requires a reasonable believe by the lawyer they can provide competent and diligent representation, Plaintiff argues a lawyer cannot simply argue honest belief they can provide competent representation to all clients when such belief is not reasonable, Klemm, 75 Cal.App.3d at 898 ("a purported consent to dual representation of … mckinsey clinically integrated networksWeb3 Feb 2024 · Section 397 CrPC gives the High Courts or the Sessions Courts jurisdiction to consider the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding inter se an order and as to the … lick it up food truck